Showing posts with label Victims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victims. Show all posts

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Colorado: Murder victim relatives join death penalty protest

Relatives of other murder victims have joined the father of a Colorado prison guard in protesting the death penalty in Castle Rock.

Bob Autobee has been a constant presence outside the court there this week as potential jurors line up for the upcoming trial of the inmate accused of killing his son, Eric Autobee, over a decade ago. On Wednesday, the husband of Mary Ricard, a guard killed by another inmate, and a cousin of Colleen O'Connor, who was killed by Nathan Dunlap, also held up signs stating their opposition.

District Attorney George Brauchler plans to seek the death penalty against Edward Montour if jurors convict him. Montour originally pleaded guilty and was sentenced to death but won a new trial. He has now pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.

Source: Associated Press, January 9, 2014

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Deciding on death penalty in bombing case

On a recent program, CNN’s Piers Morgan asked Arnold Schwarzenegger his opinion on whether accused Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev should receive the death penalty. Although admitting that he was not fully informed about the case, the former Governor of California responded, “If convicted, I think that yeah, he should get the death penalty. Yes."

While Schwarzenegger, like the rest of us, is welcome to have and express an opinion, certainly the decision on such an important, life-and-death matter should not be based on what the majority of the public thinks or wants.

But what about the bombing victims and their families? Should their majority be a major factor on whether the Federal Government should seek the death penalty against Tsarnaev? And should their wishes be communicated to the jury?

Consistent with Justice Department procedure, U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz is in fact consulting with the victims and their families' families before making a recommendation to Attorney General Holder. Reportedly, she has distributed a questionnaire to hundreds of victims that includes the matter of capital punishment.

Hopefully, this part of the decision-making process is more about political correctness than public policy. It is absolutely appropriate for the victims to be kept informed about significant developments in the case. However, the preferences of victims should not guide either prosecutorial strategy or sentencing decisions.


By James Alan Fox, Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law and Public Policy, Northeastern University. Source: Corrections.com, Sept. 3, 2013.

Monday, August 20, 2012

Death Penalty opponents’ unlikely allies

Across the country, family members of murder victims have come out against capital punishment.

Victoria Coward remembers hearing the gunshots ring out from Edgewood Park, not far from her New Haven home in June 2007. Later that night her worst fears were realized when detectives knocked on her front door.

Her 18-year-old son, Tyler, was dead from gunshot wounds to the head and chest.

Two years later, when police arrested and charged Jose Fuentes-Pillich, a 23-year-old who she thought was Tyler’s friend, Coward had already joined a campaign against the death penalty.

When she contacted Fuentes-Pillich after his conviction in 2010, she explained why she didn’t wish him dead.

“I told him it would be wrong for me to say, ‘You should die.’ That’s not in me. That’s in God’s hands … the first thing I need to do is forgive you for taking my son’s life,” Coward recalled in an interview with The Crime Report.

Connecticut became the 17th state to abolish the death penalty in April. As opponents step up their national campaign, they are discovering some surprising allies among people like Coward— challenging the long-held stereotype that the families of murder victims automatically support capital punishment.


Source: Salon, Graham Kates, August 20, 2012

Saturday, February 25, 2012

Japan: Murder case shouldn't set precedent

The main gallows of the
Tokyo Detention Center
The Supreme Court's No. 1 Petit Bench in a 3-1 decision on Feb. 20 upheld a high court ruling that sentenced a man to death for raping and strangling housewife Yayoi Motomura, 23, and murdering her 11-month-old daughter Yuka in Hikari, Yamaguchi Prefecture, in 1999. Juvenile Law prohibits sentencing to death persons who were younger than 18 at the time they committed their crime. The defendant, Takayuki Otsuki, was 18 years and a month old when he committed the double murder.

A danger exists that the top court's decision could set a strong precedent for trials dealing with heinous crimes by minors. This should not be allowed to happen despite the gravity of such crimes because the possibility of rehabilitation is very high for juveniles.

In 2 earlier trials, the Yamaguchi District Court and the Hiroshima High Court gave Otsuki a life sentence on the grounds that he was only 1 month older than 18 at the time of the crimes and that there was a strong possibility that he could be rehabilitated. But the Supreme Court remanded the case to the Hiroshima High Court, saying that the defendant's age is no longer a critical factor to avoid handing down a death sentence. In the retrial the high court sentenced Otsuki to death.

On Feb. 20, the nation's top court turned down Otsuki's appeal citing the seriousness of the crime and his responsibility, despite his being a minor when he committed the murders and the possibility that he could still be rehabilitated. The decision strengthens the trend of attaching more importance to the seriousness of a crime's consequence and the feelings of the victim's family in crimes committed by minors.

In 1983, the Supreme Court set down a standard that treated a death sentence as exceptional and stated that the death penalty can be allowed when it is the most just and logical choice. The standard stipulated several factors must be considered when handing out a death sentence, including the motivation behind the crime, the degree of cruelty, the seriousness of the crime's consequence, the feelings of the victim's family and the age of the criminal.

No one will argue that Otsuki's crimes were not horrific. Still, the possibility that he could be rehabilitated should have been given more weight. The one dissenting justice pointed out that Otsuki's mental and moral maturity were low for his age and stated that this should have been a mitigating factor in deciding his fate. He said the court needed to look more into the circumstances that contributed to his character and mental state. We agree, and hope that this case does not set a strong precedent.

Source: Editorial, The Japan Times, Feb. 25, 2012

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Texas executes Mark Stroman

Mark Stroman
A man who embarked on a shooting spree in what he claimed was retaliation for 9/11 has been executed at a prison in Texas.

The lone survivor of Mark Stroman's attack on convenience store workers in late 2001, Rais Bhuiyan, originally from Bangladesh, unsuccessfully sued to stop the execution, saying his religious beliefs as a Muslim required him to forgive the man. The courts denied his request.

Stroman, 41, had said hate in the world needed to end and asked for God's grace shortly before the fatal drugs began flowing into his arms. He was pronounced dead less than an hour after his final court appeal was rejected.

Stroman claimed the shooting spree that killed two men and injured a third targeted people from the Middle East, though all three victims were from south Asia. It was the death of 49-year-old Vasudev Patel, from India, that put Stroman on death row. He was also charged but not tried in the shooting death of Waqar Hasan, 46, a Pakistani immigrant who moved to Dallas in 2001 to open a convenience store.

Stroman's execution was the eighth this year in Texas. At least eight other inmates have execution dates in the coming weeks.

From inside the death chamber, Stroman looked at five friends watching through a window and told them he loved them.

"Even though I lay on this gurney, seconds away from my death, I am at total peace," he said. He called himself "still a proud American, Texas loud, Texas proud".

"God bless America. God bless everyone," he added, then turned his head to the warden and said: "Let's do this damn thing."

Feeling the drugs beginning to take effect, he said, he began a countdown. "One, two," he said, slightly gasping. "There it goes."

Eleven minutes later, he was dead.

None of Patel's relatives attended the execution, and instead selected a police officer to represent them.

The execution was delayed for almost three hours before the Texas court of criminal appeals barred a state judge in Austin from considering Bhuiyan's lawsuit to stop the execution. The US supreme court had rejected appeals earlier in the day.

Bhuiyan had asked the courts to halt Stroman's execution and said he wanted to spend time with the inmate to learn more about why the shootings occurred. He lost sight in one of his eyes when Stroman shot him in the face.

"Killing him is not the solution," Bhuiyan said. "He's learning from his mistake. If he's given a chance, he's able to reach out to others and spread that message to others."

A federal district judge in Austin rejected the lawsuit and Bhuiyan's request for an injunction.

Stroman was free on bond for a gun possession arrest at the time of the attack. He had previous convictions for burglary, robbery, theft and credit card abuse, served at least two prison terms and was paroled twice. His juvenile record showed he was involved in an armed robbery at the age of 12.

When police arrested him the day Patel was killed, they found the .44-calibre handgun used in the shooting. Stroman confessed, and court documents show he told authorities he belonged to the Aryan Brotherhood, a white supremacist prison gang. Prosecutors also said he told another jail inmate about the shootings and how automatic weapons police found in his car were intended for a planned attack at a shopping mall.

Stroman more recently denied the white supremacist description. He also had avoided trouble in prison in recent years, said a Texas department of criminal justice spokeswoman.

Stroman blamed the shootings on the loss of a sister in the collapse of one of the World Trade Centre towers – although prosecutors said in court documents that there was no firm evidence she ever existed.

"I wanted those Arabs to feel the same sense of vulnerability and uncertainty on American soil much like the mindset of chaos and bedlam that they were already accustomed to in their home country," he said on a website devoted to his case.

But he also said he'd made a "terrible mistake out of love, grief and anger" and had destroyed his victims' families "out of pure anger and stupidity".

"I'm not the monster the media portrays me," he said last week from death row.

Stroman was also charged but not tried in the shooting death of Waqar Hasan. Hasan was killed four days after the terrorists struck. The attack on Bhuiyan came a week later.

Source: The Guardian, July 21, 2011


Man executed after appeals run out

Appeals court halts hearing while victim was testifying that he wanted to meet with condemned man.

Victim Rais Bhuiyan
It was almost 8 p.m. Wednesday when Rais Bhuiyan finally got a chance to tell a judge why his attacker's execution, also scheduled for Wednesday evening, should be delayed so he could meet the man who tried to kill him.

"I would love him to explain, why? How?" said Bhuiyan, who was shot in the face by Mark Stroman during a crime spree in 2001 that left two of Stroman's other Dallas-area victims dead.

"When he shot me, I was bleeding," Bhuiyan said, crying. "What was going through his mind? Did he ever think about his kid? I'm somebody's kid as well."

Bhuiyan's poignant testimony was cut short when visiting state District Judge Joe Hart learned that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals had issued an order prohibiting him from continuing.

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Stroman's appeals, and he was put to death about 9 p.m.

"I would say that we just repealed the victims' rights act in Texas," said Bhuiyan's lawyer, Khurrum Wahid of Florida.

Bhuiyan, a 37-year-old from Bangladesh who is a naturalized U.S. citizen, was working as a convenience store clerk in Dallas in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks when he was shot by Stroman, who according to testimony at his trial was a white supremacist who said he was out for revenge. Stroman has said his sister died in the attacks, but prosecutors have said there is no proof of that.

Stroman also fatally shot Waqar Hasan in his Dallas convenience store, and Vsudev Patel, a gas station attendant in nearby Mesquite. Both were immigrants — Patel from India and Hasan from Pakistan.

Bhuiyan, who works at a travel website, has said that his Muslim faith calls on him to forgive Stroman and that he wanted to break the cycle of violence and spare Stroman's life. He said he believes that Stroman was a product of his upbringing and has changed since the attack.

But his court bid focused solely on delaying the execution. He sued Gov. Rick Perry and Texas prison and parole officials this month in state District Court in Travis County, claiming that his rights as a crime victim had been violated. Particularly, he said, he was never told that the prison system offered mediation to victims of crime who want to speak with an offender.

Bhuiyan told Hart that the attack left him blind in one eye, ruined his marriage and threw him into deep depression and poverty.

"I couldn't believe I had to go through this in the best country in the world," he said.

He said that had been told during the prosecution of the case to avoid speaking to Stroman and that he only began to rebuild his life during a spiritual awakening on a trip to Mecca in 2009.

Asked by his lawyer why he wanted to speak to Stroman, Bhuiyan said: "I want to see him. I want to talk to him in person. I want to connect with him in a human way. I want to know many things, many questions."

Earlier in the day, Wahid, Bhuiyan and other members of his legal team were in federal court asking U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel to delay the execution. Yeakel denied the bid, saying he did not have the legal right to intervene, a decision that was later affirmed by an appellate court.

During the court hearings, Bhuiyan had by his side Paula Kurland, whose daughter, Mitzi Johnson Nalley, 21, was stabbed to death in a brutal 1986 attack in North Austin. Jonathan Nobles was executed in 1998 for the crime, and Kurland said she was only able to move on with her life after speaking to Nobles weeks before his execution.

"This is a life-changing event," Kurland said of the prison mediation.

As he left the Heman Sweatt Travis County Courthouse on Wednesday night, Bhuiyan looked shocked.

"He's gone," he said of Stroman. "Who's going to give me my answers?"

Source: S. Kreytak, The Statesman, July 20, 2011


Lundbeck’s Pentobarbital kills its 21st patient in Texas on July 20, 2011


Lundbeck‘s Pentobarbital kills its 21st patient in Texas on July 20, 2011.

Gov. Rick Perry certainly found a partner in crime, Lundbeck the death lab, to continue his killing spree. Mark Stroman was put to death in Huntsville yesterday and became Gov. Rick Perry’s 233rd victim and Lundbeck’s 21st patient.

Despite numerous pleas for clemency, including an amazing campaign pursued over the course of several months by Mark Stroman’s surviving victim, Rais Bhuyian, Texas continues to be the killing field of the United States. Not only Texas disrespects those on death row and their families, but it also ignores the victims of crime it pretends to protect and defend. Now, more than ever, it is clearly established that Gov. Rick Perry only listens to the calls for revenge and retribution from victims and their families. The voices of victims calling for peaceful and fair resolution are being gagged.

Evidently Texas remains on top of the most infamous list in the Western world, entering the 21st century as the champion of barbarity and medieval practices on all accounts.

Lundbeck is now responsible for 21 of the 29 executions carried out so far in the United States since December 2010.

Two more patients await Lundbeck’s treatment between now and the end of July 2011:
Andrew Grant DeYoung, Georgia, July 21, 2011
(execution to be carried out between the 20th and 27th)
Robert Jackson III, Delaware, July 29, 2011

Share this post to raise awareness around you!

Source: The Pentobarbital Experiment, July 21, 2011


Related articles:
8 hours ago
Texas Governor Rick Perry (left) faces calls to intervene to sort out the legal chaos surrounding today's scheduled execution of Mark Stroman in Huntsville, Texas. The state is fighting several unprecedented lawsuits in ...
Jul 20, 2011
Mark Stroman was sentenced to death for a series of shootings in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, which left two men dead and one man injured. He is due to be executed in Texas on July 20. Mark's surviving victim ...
12 hours ago
Bhuiyan's attacker, Mark Stroman, is scheduled to be executed tomorrow in Dallas. In an interview with Timothy Williams, Bhuiyan's comments reinforce the impression his earlier statements gave: here is a person who ...
Jul 17, 2011
I am not asking you to feel sorry for me, and I won't hide the truth," Mark Anthony Stroman said from Texas death row at the Polunsky Correctional Unit in Livingston. "I am a human being and made a terrible mistake out ...

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Governor Perry urged to sort out legal ‘mess’ over today's execution of Mark Stroman, as clemency board ignores plea from victim

Texas Governor Rick Perry (left) faces calls to intervene to sort out the legal chaos surrounding today's scheduled execution of Mark Stroman in Huntsville, Texas. The state is fighting several unprecedented lawsuits in various courts this morning even as it prepares to kill Mr Stroman later this evening.

Mr Stroman was sentenced to death for a series of shootings in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, which left two men dead and one man injured. The state's legal teams are now struggling on two major fronts: first to justify Mr Stroman's execution to the Supreme Court in the face of staunch opposition by the surviving victim Rais Bhuiyan, and second to defend the state's record on victims' rights after multiple violations during the trial in 2002.

Yet even as compelling evidence mounts against Texas, the state's Board of Pardons and Paroles has denied clemency and treated an urgent plea from victim Rais Bhuiyan with apparent contempt. In an act of disturbing disrespect to the survivor of a violent ‘hate crime’, the Board flatly rejected a plea from Mr Bhuiyan and ignored his urgent request to appear before them. The Board’s heartless treatment of an innocent victim makes a mockery of the state’s much-mentioned respect for the dignity and rights of victims of violent crimes, and raises questions about who exactly this execution is for.

Reprieve's director Clive Stafford Smith said: "The state of Texas has got itself into a terrible mess over victim's rights. When a victim is calling for the death penalty, the state stands firm with him -- yet when a victim seeks to enforce his right to forgiveness and compassion, the state turns against him.

"Now, in response to Rais Bhuiyan's courageous lawsuit, Governor Perry is arguing that the hallowed rights of victims should be hollow rights, and he has run to federal court to try to read victims out of Texas law.

"Rather than deferring to federal court, Gov. Perry must intervene immediately to reassert Texas's much-mentioned respect for victims of crime. And the state of Texas must ask: if the victim does not want this execution, who exactly is it for?"

Background:

Mark Stroman was sentenced to death for a series of shootings in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, which left two men dead and one man injured. He is due to be executed in Texas on July 20. Mark’s surviving victim, Rais Bhuiyan, does not want his attacker to be executed and is actively campaigning for Mark’s sentence to be commuted to life imprisonment. During the 2002 trial, Mr. Bhuiyan was not given the opportunity to tell the court that he was strongly against the death penalty. Due to his religious belief in forgiveness, Mr. Bhuiyan has requested a meaningful period of mediation with Mr. Stroman. He has had no response to his request from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. He is now suing the Governor of Texas, Rick Perry, for multiple violations of his rights as a victim of violent crime under the Texas Victims' Bill of Rights.

For more information please contact Donald Campbell or Katherine O'Shea at Reprieve’s Press Office: donald.campbell@reprieve.org.uk / +44 (0) 20 7427 1082
katherine.oshea@reprieve.org.uk +44 (0) 20 7427 1099 / (0) 7931 592 674.

Reprieve
PO Box 52742
London EC4P 4WS
Tel: 020 7353 4640
Fax: 020 7353 4641

Related articles:
16 hours ago
Mark Stroman was sentenced to death for a series of shootings in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, which left two men dead and one man injured. He is due to be executed in Texas on July 20. Mark's surviving victim ...
4 hours ago
Bhuiyan's attacker, Mark Stroman, is scheduled to be executed tomorrow in Dallas. In an interview with Timothy Williams, Bhuiyan's comments reinforce the impression his earlier statements gave: here is a person who ...
Jul 17, 2011
I am not asking you to feel sorry for me, and I won't hide the truth," Mark Anthony Stroman said from Texas death row at the Polunsky Correctional Unit in Livingston. "I am a human being and made a terrible mistake out ...

_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Rais Bhuiyan's impact

Rais Bhuiyan
Last month I posted about Rais Bhuiyan, the Muslim hate crime victim who is advocating that his attacker, who shot Bhuiyan as part of a post-9/11 shooting spree in which two other victims were killed, be spared the death penalty.

Bhuiyan's attacker, Mark Stroman, is scheduled to be executed tomorrow in Dallas. In an interview with Timothy Williams, Bhuiyan's comments reinforce the impression his earlier statements gave: here is a person who understands deeply his faith's call to reconciliation and peacemaking. "I decided that forgiveness was not enough," he says. "I decided I had to do something to save this person's life."

But I'm struck even more by what Stroman has to say about the situation. The convicted killer answered Williams's questions in a typewritten letter. Here's an excerpt (the ellipses are Stroman's):

Not only do I have all My friends and supporters trying to Save my Life, but now i have The Islamic Community Joining in...Spearheaded by one Very Remarkable man Named Rais Bhuiyan, Who is a Survivor of My Hate. His deep Islamic Beliefs Have gave him the strength to Forgive the Un-forgiveable...that is truly Inspiring to me, and should be an Example for us all. The Hate, has to stop, we are all in this world together. My jesus Faith & Texas Roots have Deepened My Understanding as well. Its almost been 10 years since The world stopped Turning, and we as a nation will never be able to forget what we felt that day, I surely wont, but I can tell you what im feeling Today, and that's very grateful for Rais Bhuiyan's Efforts to save my life after I tried to end His.

It's worth noting that Bhuiyan didn't set out to teach Stroman that his beliefs about Muslims were ignorant and hateful. He set out to save Stroman from death at the hands of a justice system that argues that people like him are beyond redemption. It looks like he'll fail at that goal, but the fact that he tried helped to effect a remarkable change of heart in Stroman--who, of course, exists within the reach of grace just like everyone else does.

Source: The Christian Century, S. Thorngate, July 19, 2011

Related articles:

11 hours ago
One of twelve jurors who served in the trial of Mark Stroman in 2002 has made a last-minute appeal to the Governor of Texas to spare his life. With only 24 hours until Mr Stroman's scheduled execution, juror Jenifer ...
Jul 17, 2011
I am not asking you to feel sorry for me, and I won't hide the truth," Mark Anthony Stroman said from Texas death row at the Polunsky Correctional Unit in Livingston. "I am a human being and made a terrible mistake out ...
Jul 14, 2011
Mr Bhuiyan was shot by Mark Stroman in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Fueled by his addiction to methamphetamine, which he used to medicate his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Mr Stroman was close to the edge ...
23 hours ago
Mr Bhuiyan was shot by Mark Stroman in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Fueled by his addiction to methamphetamine, which he used to medicate his post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Mr Stroman was close to the edge . ...

_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

Texas inmate set to die for hate crimes in 9/11's wake

Washington (CNN) -- "I cannot tell you that I am an innocent man. I am not asking you to feel sorry for me, and I won't hide the truth," Mark Anthony Stroman said from Texas death row at the Polunsky Correctional Unit in Livingston. "I am a human being and made a terrible mistake out of love, grief and anger, and believe me, I am paying for it every single minute of the day."

The 41-year-old prisoner is scheduled to be executed Wednesday [July 20, 2011] for a murder he once said was fueled by "patriotism," but which the state argued was motivated by pure hatred.

The admitted white supremacist was convicted in the deadly shooting of an Indian man, part of a killing spree that began just after the September 11 terror attacks. His target: those he believed were of Middle Eastern background, in revenge and retaliation for the worst domestic terror incident in U.S. history.

A Pakistani man was also murdered and a Bangladeshi man was seriously wounded in separate attacks.

The Supreme Court denied a stay of execution last month. Stroman's supporters are urging the governor and the state Board of Pardons and Parole to grant clemency.

One of Stroman's biggest supporters is the man who survived his ordeal and testified against the defendant. Rais Bhuiyan is a devout Muslim who came to the United States to pursue his education. A decade ago, he was about to be married and was working an extra job.

He says a large "angry" man wearing a bandana, sunglasses and a baseball cap approached him in the store and asked, "Where are you from?" Confused, Bhuiyan asked, "Excuse me?" Immediately afterward, he remembered being shot, "the sensation of a million bees stinging my face, and then heard an explosion."

Bhuiyan believes that his attacker does not deserve to die and has created a website, worldwithouthate.org, to urge Texas to spare Stroman's life.

"In order to live in a better and peaceful world, we need to break the cycle of hate and violence. I believe forgiveness is the best policy, which helps to break this cycle," he said, calling himself a victim of a hate crime. "I forgave Mark Stroman many years ago. I believe he was ignorant and not capable of distinguishing between right and wrong. Otherwise he wouldn't have done what he did."


Source: CNN, July 16, 2011



Related articles:
Jul 13, 2011
Nearly slain by a racist killer in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Rais Bhuiyan is now hoping to prevent the man's execution on Texas' death row. On Wednesday, he even asked for the German government for help. ...
Jul 14, 2011
Rais Bhuiyan is expected to file the suit at Travis County Courthouse, Austin, TX, at 10 a.m. local time. Mr Bhuiyan was shot by Mark Stroman in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. Fueled by his addiction to methamphetamine ...
Jun 03, 2011
In a drug-fueled mission of revenge, he killed two South Asian immigrants and shot another — Rais Bhuiyan — in the face at close range, blinding him in one eye. Shortly after his arrest, Stroman boasted of his role as ...
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, June 3, 2011

A victim of 9/11 hate crime now fights for his attacker's life

Rais Bhuiyan, shot in the face
by Mark Stroman in a shooting rampage
motivated by the 9/11 attacks,
 is now leading the effort to prevent his attacker
from being executed next month in Texas.
Days after the 9/11 terror attacks, 31-year old laborer Mark Stroman went on a shooting spree in the Dallas area. In a drug-fueled mission of revenge, he killed two South Asian immigrants and shot another — Rais Bhuiyan — in the face at close range, blinding him in one eye.

Shortly after his arrest, Stroman boasted of his role as "Arab Slayer."

Now, as Stroman faces imminent execution in Texas, an unlikely champion is fighting to save his life: Bhuiyan, who spent years recovering from the wounds he suffered in the attack.

"I've had many years to grow spiritually," said Bhuiyan, a Muslim who immigrated to the U.S. from Bangladesh and now works as technology professional in Dallas. "I'm trying to do my best not to allow the loss of another human life. I'll knock on every door possible."

Bhuiyan began collecting signatures late last year on a petition asking the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to commute Stroman's death penalty sentence to life in prison without parole through his website "World without Hate." Now he is working systematically through legal and political channels to save Stroman's life.

"I'm getting a lot of support from all over the world … even my home country, where the Internet is a luxury," Bhuiyan said.

Among those supporting his cause are some relatives of the two victims who were killed.

The odds are stacked against Stroman, 41, who is held in the Texas State Penitentiary, where he is scheduled to be executed on July 20.


Source: Today News, June 3, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Mississippi: Faith leaders call to end death penalty

Leaders of Muslim, Jewish and Christian congregations gathered Thursday at the Capitol to call for an end to the death penalty in Mississippi.

Death penalty supporter Ann Pace of Jackson, meanwhile, held pictures of her daughter, who she said died at the hands of a serial killer.

The main point of contention between the Mississippi Religious Leadership Conference and Pace is whether the death penalty effectively deters crime, but the issue also hinges on inequity in the criminal justice system and religious principles.

“We face the real possibility of three state-sanctioned executions within the next month,” said the Episcopal Rev. Carol Borne Spencer. “The organization thus felt that the time was now for us to ask our state leaders to find new ways to deal with one of the largest societal dilemmas of our time, that is how to deal with heinous criminal actions of murder and violence and still hold people accountable in ways that do not require the killing of a person."

On Wednesday, the Mississippi Supreme Court set execution dates for 2 convicted killers, and Attorney General Jim Hood has requested an execution date for a 3rd.

The religious conference, which grew out of the 1960s civil rights movement, asked Thursday for crime victim support. But members said executions only create new victims — the families of executed criminals. Isolating criminals is better than condemning them to death, members said.

Pace, whose daughter Murray Pace was slain by reputed south Louisiana serial killer Derrick Todd Lee in May 2002, disagrees.

Lee, 43, sits on death row at the Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola for Pace’s murder. Murray was killed at the age of 22, 1 week after graduating with an MBA from Louisiana State University.

Lee is suspected of killing 7 south Louisiana women between 1998 and 2003, but Pace said he has not yet been put to death because Louisiana state law allows too many appeals.

“Even though the case is a DNA case, his DNA in 7 murders, and it’s been upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court twice, Louisiana still provides for a system called post-conviction relief that can go on for years and years and years, and it made sense before forensic science. It does not make sense now,” said Pace.

She cited a series of studies in the early 2000s finding that each execution prevents between 3 and 18 slayings. The studies have been widely disseminated by pro-death penalty advocates but widely criticized for technical and conceptual errors by those who oppose execution.

“I am here for those three to 18 additional victims,” Pace said. “I think abolishing the death penalty is idealistic, sounds good, feels good to support, but it does not protect life, it does not protect us, and I think our most important moral obligation in our life is to protect ourselves, our children, and our community, and I think that the death penalty does in fact do that."

In addition to the debate over deterrence, the Capitol press conference brought up issues of social equality and faith.

Okolo Rashid of Jackson's International Museum of Muslim Cultures signed the MRLC's call for a moratorium. She said her faith would allow her to support the death penalty if the system did not disproportionately execute black men.

Another MRLC member invoked the symbolism of the Christian day of Good Friday, which marks the day Jesus Christ was crucified.

“We know that Jesus Christ would not want the death penalty for anyone, having suffered himself at the hands of the state,” said the Catholic Bishop Joseph N. Latino of Jackson.

Set to be executed May 10 is Benny Joe Stevens, now 52, who was sentenced to death in 1999 for killing his ex-wife and her husband, his 11-year-old son and his son's 10-year-old friend.

Meanwhile, state officials have set a May 17 execution date for Rodney Gray, now 38, who was sentenced to death in 1996 for the 1994 rape and murder of 79-year-old Grace Blackwell of Louin. Blackwell, who had last been seen withdrawing a large amount of money from her bank, was found shot multiple times in Newton County.

Robert Simon Jr. was sentenced to death for the killings of 3 members of a Quitman County family, but his attorneys say a fall has rendered him incompetent for execution. Hood had earlier asked for an April 20 execution date.

Source: Associated Press, April 23, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Oklahoma City victim's dad speaks against death penalty

Bud Welch found that he had a lot in common with the father of the man executed for killing 168 people -- including Welch's daughter Julie -- in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. "We both buried our children, in different ways and at different times, but from the same event," he said during a program here Tuesday night.

Julie Welch was 23, working as a Spanish interpreter in the Social Security Administration the morning that a bomb leveled the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building. She had just met a client in the lobby and was leading him into the office when the blast occurred, shortly after 9 a.m. on April 19, 1995. She was planning to have lunch with her father in a little Greek restaurant across the street later that day.

"That was a Wednesday; they found her body on Saturday," Welch said. "I found out later that she and her boyfriend had been talking about getting engaged. Timothy McVeigh was convicted more than two years later and was ultimately executed, but nothing about that gave me any peace."

A board member of Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights, Welch spoke to about 25 people in the St. Gabriel Church Hall. He talked about driving Julie to Marquette University for her freshman year, and inadvertently embarrassing her by taking his daughter's teddy bear out of the car in front of her dorm. He described his daughter's gift for learning languages, her two semesters studying abroad and her determination to win scholarships to help pay for college. But Julie was a real person who also had her flaws, Welch said.

"I'm not going to tell you about those tonight," the retired service station owner said. But he shared one other memory: his daughter had opposed the 1991 Gulf War -- the war that McVeigh and co-defendant Terry Nichols returned from with post-traumatic stress syndrome. A devout Catholic, Julie also opposed the death penalty, her dad said, "because she said it was teaching children to hate."

And so, before the trial, Welch met with Bill and Jennifer McVeigh, Tim's father and sister, in their Buffalo home and promised to do whatever he could to keep Timothy from getting the death penalty.

"When I said that, I felt like a tremendous weight had been lifted from me," Welch said. "I never felt closer to God, and I'd met an even bigger victim of the Oklahoma City bombing. Every time I talk about Julie I keep her memory alive, but because of what happened Bill McVeigh was never able to say anything positive about his son."

Among the attendees Tuesday night was Joseph Benefico, a retired Milford police sargeant. His long career in law enforcement has left him with decidely mixed views on capital punishment, Benefico said. "On one hand there's the chance that the wrong person could be executed. There have been 138 people cleared by DNA evidence who were on death row. But then, with the Cheshire home invasion, it's really hard to oppose it in that case."

Connecticut appears close once again to abolishing the death penalty, said Bo Chamberlin, field organizer for the state network working for its repeal. A bill in the Judiciary Committee is likely to be approved next week and presented to the House and Senate for a full vote, and Gov. Dannel P Malloy has promised to sign it, Chamberlin said. Then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell vetoed a similar measure in 2009.

Source: Connecticut Post, April 6, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Texas: Many death row prisoners want to apologize, Canadian study finds

Wilfred Laurier University researcher Judy Eaton, who was part of a panel discussion at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences conference in Toronto Wednesday, concluded in a study that nearly 1/3 of death row inmates made sincere apologies for their crimes.

When Canadian researcher Judy Eaton set out to study the human yearning to apologize she turned her sights to Texas’s death row.

In the final minutes before execution, condemned prisoners have no realistic hope of changing their fate and nothing practical to gain from telling victims they are sorry.

Yet many do.

In what is believed to be the first study of apologies in such a setting, Eaton, an associate professor of psychology at Wilfrid Laurier University’s Brantford campus, along with criminology student Anna Theuer, analyzed the last statements of 305 inmates executed by Texas between 1982 and 2007.

Nearly a third spontaneously apologized for their crimes and showed signs of true repentance, such as taking responsibility for their actions and expressions of empathy.

The results were presented Wednesday at a meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences in Toronto.

While previous research on apologies focused on people with their lives ahead of them, the prisoners who apologized before being put to death in Texas could do nothing more to affect their sentence or gain leniency.

This doesn’t mean their apologies were all sincere, Eaton acknowledges, and it doesn’t discount the possibility inmates were apologizing to make themselves feel better or because of religious beliefs about being judged in an afterlife.

But it does reduce the possibility they offered regrets for purely manipulative reasons and also dispels the image of death row inmates as largely unrepentant and in denial about guilt, she said.

With research already confirming victims want and benefit from apologies, the results of the Texas study also suggest that criminal justice systems should devote more attention to ensuring offenders can provide them, Eaton said.

“The general take-home message is they (offenders) do want to apologize and victims do tend to want apologies,” she said in an interview. “So, clearly the apology needs to be considered in the criminal justice system."

In some ways, Canada has already taken the lead, Eaton said, with restorative justice programs as well as legislation in three provinces, including Ontario, which allows people to offer apologies without admitting legal liability.

In introducing the legislation three years ago, Attorney General Chris Bentley said the absence of an apology can lead to bitter and protracted litigation when people are wronged.

Wrongly convicted Canadians have also sought apologies from the courts and Prime Minister Stephen Harper apologized on behalf of Canadians in 2008 to former students of Indian Residential Schools.

But unlike Britain and Australia, the federal government hasn’t apologized for an early 20th century migration scheme that brought thousands of children to Canada as indentured labour.

University of Central Florida researcher Timothy Colyer, who also spoke at the Toronto conference, argues death row offenders may adopt a deferential tone in their final statements because they’re trying to cling to whatever thread of dignity they have and because they fell into a habit of showing respect to prison staff to receive humane treatment.

Dead Men Talking

Canadians Judy Eaton and Anna Theuer analyzed the last statements of executed offenders, which are published on the Texas Department of Criminal Justice website.

Their work was funded by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Here’s what some prisoners said:

Richard Dinkins, executed Jan 29, 2003

“If there were any way I could change things and bring them back I would."

Keith Clay, executed March 20, 2003

“I know you have suffered a great loss."

Douglas Roberts, executed April 20, 2005 (coded in the study as insincere)

“Okay, I’ve been hanging around this Popsicle stand way too long. When I die, bury me deep, lay two speakers at my feet, put some headphones on my head and rock and roll me when I’m dead."

Michael Hall, executed Feb. 15, 2011 (after the study)

“I would like to give my sincere apology to Amy’s family. We caused a lot of heartache, grief, pain and suffering, and I’m sorry. I know it won’t bring her back. I would like to sing. I would like to sing, for that person’s dead. The old is gone. I am not the same person that I used to be . . . As for my family, I am sorry I let you down."

Source: The Star, March 2, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Murder victim families urge death penalty repeal

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — The latest call to abolish Connecticut's death penalty is coming from the families of some murder victims.

A letter signed by 60 people who have had loved ones killed will be presented to the Legislature on Wednesday by the Connecticut Network to Abolish the Death Penalty.

The letter states that those who have dealt with the criminal justice system and struggled with the grief of having a loved one murdered have concluded the death penalty only inflicts more pain on survivors.

Governor Dannel P. Malloy, a former prosecutor, has said he is morally opposed to the death penalty. But he's facing a state budget deficit that's projected to top $3 billion and says repealing the death penalty is not an immediate priority.

Source: NECN, February 5, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Delaware: Gripping Testimony of a Wife at Husband's Execution

The Abolition Movement thanks Sis Marpessa for sharing this touching, painful and moving story. We always say that when someone is executed, that execution creates another victim's family. If you wonder if this is true, read this sister's words. Share her pain. Then take the emotions these words generate and transform that into energy to fight to end all state killings.

Testimony from Shakeerah R. Hameen
February 10, 2005

I am writing this testimony because I feel that the public is entitled to know how an execution affects not only the offender’s family, but the guards, lawyers, and all those involved.

On May 21, 2001 my husband, Abdullah Tanzel Hameen, was murdered by the State of Delaware. My mother-in-law and I were among the many witnesses that stood by and watched this murder occur.

The day was beautiful; there was a warm breeze, a clear sky and the brightest sunshine you ever wanted to see. As I opened my eyes to this magnificent day I realized the irony in the beauty that surrounded me because on this day my best friend, my lover, my companion, my precious husband was going to be murdered and there wasn’t a damn thing I could do about.

All of our appeals were exhausted and we had been turned down by the Pardon Board, although, they said that they agreed my husband was exceptionally rehabilitated, BUT the jury found him guilty and the jury recommended DEATH BY LETHAL INJECTION, so there was no other choice but to set a date for his execution.

Preparing for the first scheduled visit of my husband’s last day was like being in a fog.

I took my shower, made salat, drank my coffee and walked out the door. As I started the car I began to think this is not really happening, this is not for real. How can they possibly murder my husband and think that it is right. How can any one believe that this is not premeditated murder?

I drove to the prison, parked the car and headed for the newly built Death House. The guards who knew me kept their heads hung low as they escorted me, barely speaking to me, not knowing what to say. I had an exceptional relationship with the guards as did my husband and I think they thought this day would never come; after all the Pardon Board said he was exceptionally rehabilitated. When we got to the Death House I was patted down, searched and then led inside.

My husband was in a cage with a bed; on the bed was his prayer rug and Koran. At a desk was a guard writing down every movement my husband made and every word that we spoke. As I looked at my husband I thought this is really it, this is really the last day I will ever see my husband again. My head was pounding and my heart was racing; I felt as if I was going to pass out. What do you say to someone you love before they are put to death? I looked into his beautiful eyes and when I started to talk I choked and just started to cry. I cried and cried and cried. My husband sat quietly and tried to console me as best he could through the cage that separated us. Our first visit of the day, which was an hour, was spent awkwardly. When I got up to leave he asked that I not let them see me cry again and to stand strong.

Two hours later I was back at the Death House but this time with my mother-in-law. With the second visit there were fewer tears and even some nervous laughter, but the pain of what was happening was excruciating for all of us. There are simply no words to describe it.

Two hours later I was back again to the Death House, alone this time and my husband and I talked, I mean really talked. We talked about the love we shared and the happiness we had despite the sentence that hung over his head for ten years. We talked about how blessed we were to have discovered each other. Yet, the pain, the stress, the torture of knowing my beloved was going to die in a few hours, permeated my senses.

Two hours later my mother-in-law and I returned to the prison. We were led into a bathroom and searched, not just patted down, but the guards searched inside our bras, around the rim of our underwear and made us lift our dresses. The female guard who did the search apologized the entire time she was doing it and we could tell how horribly uncomfortable she felt.

This time we were told to wait in the waiting area of the main lobby because my husband was visiting with his attorneys. As we waited we saw people come and go with food and drinks all dressed up as if going to a party. We sat there and waited and waited for almost an hour and a half. People who knew me looked down as they passed me except for the Bureau Chief of Prisons and one of the Wardens; they came over to me and hugged me and said they were sorry, as they walked away I saw tears in their eyes.

Eventually a guard came and escorted us to another room where my husband’s attorneys were waiting for us. Both had been crying; they told us that instead of talking to my husband they ended up sobbing.

It was about 7pm and all I could think about was my husband; what was he doing, was he okay, was he scared, did he feel all alone. We sat in that room and waited and waited and waited. Around 9pm the Warden came in and said since my husband had been such a good boy that he was going to let us see him one more time.

We were escorted back to the Death House for our last visit and were permitted a two second embrace and peck on the cheek and allowed to say a five minute good bye.

Back in the room I thought let’s just do this, why wait, just kill him for God’s sake and get it over. At 11pm the Deputy Warden and two other people led me and my mother-in-law out a back corridor to a car. We got in the back seat and were driven to the Death House.

We noticed a bus full of people; it was the media and the Wardens from all over the state. In another car were the victim’s sister and two guards. We waited and we waited until 11:30pm and we were led into the Death House. As I walked into the room I saw my husband strapped to a gurney like he was on a crucifix and I thought of the irony of the way they strap a condemned man down. In the room with my husband were the Warden and another Deputy Warden and the Chaplain who was a Christian holding onto his Bible in the corner. I mention the Chaplain’s religion because we are Muslims and were promised that there would be an Iman in the room with my husband. We were led to an area at the front of the glass area that separated the room where my husband was and we just looked and all I could think was that this was insane.

After we were all in our perspective places the Warden read the death warrant and asked my husband if he had any last words. He strained to look in my eyes and he said to the victim’s sister “I pray this brings you peace” and then he looked at his mother and I and said he loved us and that he would wait for us.

The Warden nodded his head and the deadly drugs were released into his body. He strained and gasped; as he did so his body lifted somewhat and he was dead. His mother and I were praying as they killed my husband because that was all we could do, we were powerless, we just stood there and watch the state murder him.

After he was announced dead they led us out, took us to another building and gave me his belongings. The attorneys were waiting for me and so was the media. The media asked how it felt to see my husband die. I am not sure of my response but our attorneys told me Hameen would have been proud of me.

My mother-in-law walked over to hug me and I remember pulling away and saying that I was ok. I did not want to be touched or to have anyone tell me how sorry they were. I could not handle having to deal with any emotion. My friend drove me home and as I went in the house and prepared for bed I started to sob uncontrollably, it was over, Hameen was dead.

In the morning I woke up so sick that I could hardly function. My body ached and my head was pounding. As I lay in the bed I looked over at the window and there sat a bird. The bird was looking at me and as I looked back it fluttered and flew away. I believed then and I will always believe it was my husband’s spirit checking in on me and saying good bye.

You can dress this killing up all you want; you can try to disguise it in bizarre rituals and traditions – in the name of security or whatever – but you can’t take away that searing pain. You can’t take away what it does to a lawyer who will forever know he failed to save his client’s life. You can’t take away what it does to a mom or a child or a wife of the executed person. The damage is permanent.

Because of the rituals, people think that lethal injection is a humane way to commit murder; it is all very neat and over very quickly. Society puts to death the condemned and life goes on. This is far from true for the guards, the lawyers, the victim’s family and the offender’s family they will remember that night always. No matter how neat and clean an execution is it is still murder. It is a painful reminder that society is vengeful and that some still want their pound of flesh. It is a horrible example of how little we have learned from the mistakes of our past. Murder is murder no matter who pulls the trigger.

Today I am on disability, unable to deal full time with a society that is so hateful, I have aged tremendously and death preoccupies my mind constantly. I am so afraid of losing another loved one that it is hard sometimes to function. I have problems sleeping and problems trusting people.

My step-son, Hameen’s son, is facing 1st Degree Murder Charges and is scheduled for trial March 8th of this year, 2005. My mother-in-law has been sick off and on since the execution.

Prior to my husband’s execution I was a bright, vibrant and active woman. I believed that anything was possible and that I conquer the world. Today I struggle just to complete the everyday task of conquering my own world.

The people should know the extent of the needle’s reach. There is much more to an execution than those final minutes. I know.

(Info on Bro. Hameen is at http://www.ccadp.org/abdullahhameen.htm)

Source: Texas Death Penalty Abolition Movement, August 24, 2010

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Japan: Scrap death penalty, bereaved families say

Murder victims' kin want debate on capital punishment, arguing it brings no closure.

Bud Welch (left) lost his only daughter, Julie, in the Oklahoma City bombing that claimed the lives of 168 people on April 19, 1995. His 23-year-old daughter was working as a Spanish translator at the Social Security Administration in the federal building targeted.

Until the tragedy, Welch, who had operated a Texaco gas station for 37 years, had opposed the death penalty all his life. But the incident affected him so deeply that he wanted the two bombers executed.

"I was so full of anger, so full of revenge. I wanted the death penalty both for Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nicols," Welch said in a recent interview in Tokyo, revealing that after his daughter's death he had self-medicated with alcohol to such an extent that his body ached from alcohol poisoning. He was also smoking four packs of cigarettes a day, he said.

Amid his grief and anger, however, Welch said he began to question how he could move forward with his life. After nearly a year's reflection, he had rationalized the issue and felt strongly that executing the perpetrators was not going to help him.

"I reached a conclusion that on the day we take Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nicols from their cage to kill them, it will simply be not part of my healing process. That killing wasn't going to help me," Welch said.

In fact, on June 11, 2001, the day McVeigh was executed, Welch said he felt nothing out of the ordinary and did not feel that his wounds had healed. Several family members of the 168 victims have come to him after the execution and told him that it didn't help them either, he noted.

About 1 1/2 years after his beloved daughter's death, Welch began to travel domestically and internationally to campaign against the death penalty and raise awareness of the fact that, contrary to what many believe, families of murder victims do not necessarily support executions.

Welch is currently visiting Japan along with four other Americans who are members of the Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights. Through June and early July, the group is touring East Asia to share their experiences in the hope that they will help promote public debate about the death penalty in societies that still use capital punishment.

The group, which arrived in Japan after visiting South Korea, began their speaking tour in Tokyo on Friday. After leaving the capital, they will this week continue their travels to Kobe, Kyoto, Hiroshima and Okayama. Their tour is being supported by the European Union, whose member states have all abolished the death penalty and are pushing Japan, the United States and other countries and regions to follow suit.

Among the members visiting Japan is Bob Curley (left) from Massachusetts, a technical assistance official at the Cambridge Fire Department. On Oct. 1, 1997, Curley's 10-year-old son, Jeffrey, was sexually abused and murdered by two men. The men stole the boy's bike and lured him to their car with the promise of getting him a new one.

In the months that followed, Curley led the political fight to reinstate the death penalty in Massachusetts and started a political debate on the issue.

"Losing a family member, a loved one like that, I would think you would be insane not to seek that revenge. I was with so much anger and so much pain," said Curley, whose previous opinion about the death penalty had swayed both ways.

As he observed the trials of the two murderers, however, Curley said he began to realize that the criminal justice system was not being applied fairly. The main perpetrator was convicted of second-degree murder and a life term with the possibility of parole. But the other man, who Curley said was the "tag along," was convicted of murder in the first degree and a life term without parole.

The financial situation of the two families made the difference as the main culprit's family was able to hire a better lawyer, Curley observed.

"The criminal justice system is a very good system but it's not perfect. I was able to see that firsthand, and was able to take a step back and take a good look at the death penalty," he said.

Meeting Welch and other families of the victims who were against capital punishment also helped him through the process. "Until that point, I would feel obligated, like I would be disrespectful to Jeffrey if I wasn't in support of the death penalty," Curley said.

It took a couple of years before Curley could publicly or privately admit that he had changed his mind. But the change doesn't mean that he has forgiven the perpetrators, he said, adding that he also respects other opinions victims' families may hold toward the death penalty.

"I think the best way to honor Jeff is to live my life and try to do much good," said Curley, who often works on child safety and supports the rights of victims.

A public opinion poll by the Japanese government in December revealed that 85 percent of those surveyed said they supported the death penalty. Among the major reasons of support, 54.1 percent replied that they believed that abolishing executions will not heal the pain of the victims and their families.

To a multiple choice question, 53.2 percent also said that those who committed heinous crimes should atone for it with their lives. Another 51.5 percent said abolishing the death penalty would increase heinous crimes.

Welch, however, rejected these opinions, pointing out that perpetrators do not care what is written in the law.

"The justice system is about trying to bring justice to what happened, but also having a system that corrects or stopping that from happening in the future," he said. "I think that's where the death penalty really fails dramatically because (perpetrators) didn't care about the laws on the book. They couldn't care less," Welch said. "The only way you can stop those kinds of people is to have information and to be able to physically stop them before it happens," he said.

Welch, who is visiting Japan for the second time to share his experience, also believes that speaking about his experience and views is a mission on behalf of his daughter, who was in fact an antideath penalty advocate. "It's like I'm keeping her alive. Julie, if she were living, would be 38 now. She'll be turning 39 in September. But she will always be 23 years old."

Source: The Japan Times, June 27, 2010