Unclear future for death penalty in Ohio

USA: An Execution Frenzy

Ohio's latest experience with putting an inmate to death raises new question about the ability of states to carry out executions in constitutional fashion.

It took Dennis McGuire 26 minutes to die on Thursday after the chemicals — intravenous doses of the sedative midazolam and the painkiller hydromorphone — began flowing into his body. Initial reports said McGuire took more than 15 minutes to die. His death marked the longest execution of the 53 carried out in Ohio since capital punishment resumed 15 years ago.

McGuire, who was sentenced to die for raping and stabbing a pregnant newlywed to death in 1989, appeared unconscious but gasped repeatedly as he lay on a gurney, with his stomach rising and falling and his mouth opening and shutting.

Deborah Denno, a professor of law at Fordham University, said that a lethal injection is supposed to last about three or four minutes.

"It's hard to know exactly what went wrong," Denno told Al Jazeera. "These drugs had never been used on a human being before, and experts had predicted that these very kinds of reactions could occur."

Whether McGuire, 53, felt any pain was unclear. His death — unconsciousness, followed by apparent obstructed breathing — followed the prediction of one state expert.

The question may center on states' tolerance for a constitutional method that is difficult to observe, said Doug Berman, an Ohio State University law professor and death penalty expert.

"How much will Ohio care, how much will the rest of the country care, that it seems that what we now have discovered is Ohio is using a method that gets the job done, but looks ugly," Berman said. "We don't know if it actually was ugly. We just know that it looked ugly."

'Nobody deserves that'

Members of McGuire's family, who plan to file a lawsuit against the state, said the execution amounted to torture.

"Nobody deserves to go through that," said McGuire's son, also named Dennis.

States are in a bind for two main reasons: European companies have cut off supplies of certain execution drugs because of opposition to the death penalty. And states can't simply switch to other chemicals without triggering legal challenges from defense attorneys.

In light of what happened in Ohio, "states will now have more of a burden to show that they are using a well-thought-out best practice," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center.

Click here to read the full article

Source: Al Jazeera, January 19, 2014