Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Television. Show all posts

Sunday, February 23, 2014

USA: Robert Redford's "Death Row Stories" to Premiere on CNN

"Death Row Stories" is a new 8-part series premiering on March 9 on CNN that will examine actual death penalty cases. 

The show is produced by Robert Redford and narrated by Dead Man Walking star Susan Sarandon. 

Redford said, "This series is about the search for justice and truth, we are pleased to ... tell these important stories and give a voice to these cases." 

Prior to the premiere, CNN is offering interested parties an opportunity for a preview and the ability to participate in a Google Hangout featuring a discussion by the producers and law professors John Blume of Cornell and Robert Blecker of New York Law School. The Google Hangout will be held March 5 at 6 pm EST and is open to the public, but an RSVP is required.

Source: Death Penalty Information Center, Feb. 22, 2014

Monday, May 20, 2013

Death penalty film trip: 5,000 miles of flaws and false confessions

One for Ten project comes to an end having filmed series of shorts highlighting injustice in US capital punishment system

The journey has taken them from Philadelphia to Albuquerque via false confession, unreliable witnesses, official misconduct and racism.

The One for Ten road trip comes to an end this week after a 5,200-mile cross-country trek to interview 10 death row exonerees and make a short film about each that highlights different flaws in the US capital punishment process.

The name of the project is inspired by the more than 1,300 executions and 142 exonerations since the death penalty was reinstated in the US in 1976 – a remarkably high number of errors considering the gravity of the punishment and avowed thoroughness of the system.

The film-makers are now in New Mexico to meet Juan Melendez. He spent more than 17 years on death row in Florida, convicted largely thanks to testimony from a convicted felon who held a grudge against him - even though another man had made a confession in a recorded interview that was never played at trial.


Source: The Guardian, May 16, 2013

Monday, March 4, 2013

In China, death row entertainment is nothing new

A fierce debate is raging in China over a state-run channel's decision to air the last hours of four foreign drug smugglers before their executions for killing 13 Chinese fishermen. But the outrage belies a simple reality in China: Executions here are frequent - and TV stations have treated them as entertainment before.

From 2006 to 2012, China's Henan Province aired a hugely popular TV show called "Interviews Before Execution," in which death row inmates discussed their crimes and regrets with in-your-face host Ding Yu. The show drew 40 million nightly viewers during its run - almost 1/2 the population of Henan Province, or 1.25 times the number of Americans that watched the Olympic closing ceremonies.

"Interviews Before Execution" favored controversial inmates, like a gay man who murdered his mother and a young couple who killed the boyfriend's grandmother. The interviews could be provocative as well.

"I went to see your brother and sisters. They all know that you are leaving this world. But, sorry, they didn't want to see you," Ding Yu told one man, according to NBC.

"You're dangerous to society. You're s---," she reportedly said in another episode.

Something of that provocative tone echoed in Friday's controversial broadcast. That program included interviews with police officers, a graphic that read "Kill the Kingpin," and instant analysis from a host of pundits - what the Post's William Wan called "all the staples of modern current events coverage."

"Some viewers may consider it cruel to ask a criminal to do an interview when they are about to be executed," Ding Yu told the BBC. "On the contrary, they want to be heard."

Amnesty International believes China executes "thousands" of people each year - the most in the world. The organization stopped publishing estimates out of fear they "grossly underestimate the true number" of executions each year.

Source: Washington Post, March 3, 2013


Friday, March 1, 2013

China airs drug traffickers' moments before execution

Chinese police officers leading an
inmate into a special execution van
It was reality television in the extreme.

Chinese state television Friday broadcast nearly 1 hour of live images of the last moments of 4 foreign drug traffickers about to be executed for the 2011 killing of 13 Chinese fishermen on the Mekong River. Although the cameras pulled away before the final lethal injection, the unprecedented pre-execution coverage unleashed a storm of criticism and debate about the death penalty.

Psychologists decried the live coverage as distressing to children, while lawyers complained that it violated a clause in the criminal code against parading the condemned before execution.

"This carnival on CCTV was a violation not only of ethics, but of the criminal code regulations that the death penalty not be carried out in public," wrote human rights lawyer Liu Xiaoyuan on a microblog. Many on the microblogs, however, applauded the execution of the 4 drug traffickers.

China executes about 4,000 people each year, more than all other countries in the world combined, although the numbers and the crimes carrying the death penalty are gradually being reduced.

"I don't know of any other country, not Iran, Afghanistan or North Korea, that has nationally broadcast in this way the last moments of an executed prisoner," said Nicholas Bequelin, Hong Kong-based researcher for Human Rights Watch. "It is a step backward at a time we thought China was making progress with the death penalty."

Although many Chinese were shocked by the live coverage, they applauded the death sentences as just retribution for a particularly violent crime. The 13 Chinese fishermen were ambushed, then shot to death while tied up with rope, their bodies dumped in the river.

The outraged Chinese government considered a drone attack to kill the drug traffickers, but in the end launched an international manhunt that resulted in their capture and extradition from Laos.

The kingpin executed was Naw Kham, 44, a Burmese national who allegedly commanded a militia of 100 men in the Gold Triangle region. 2 others executed Friday were from Laos and 1 was Thai.

The live coverage showed the men being taken from their prison cells in southwestern Yunnan Province with their hands trussed behind their backs with ropes. A doctor in a white coat prepared the lethal injections.

The television commentator went on at some length about how well the men had been treated in prison.

"From the appearance of these criminals, you can clearly tell our prison has carried out humanitarian spirit, these criminals clearly look healthier, whiter, with better skin complexion than when they were arrested," the commentator said.

At one point, the television broadcast cut away to show a gala-style award ceremony complete with patriotic music and small children carrying bouquets for the investigators who had worked on capturing the drug traffickers.

Chinese television also broadcast a chilling interview with Naw Kham taped earlier this week in which he said, "I am afraid of death. I want to live. I don't want to die. I have children. I am afraid."

The Yunnan Province Public Security Bureau sent out a message at 2:55 p.m. Friday that Naw Kham and his accomplices were dead.

Source: Los Angeles Times, March 1, 2013




Monday, July 23, 2012

James Holmes: Media Already Raising Death Penalty Prospect

James Holmes at initial hearing
Colorado shooting suspect James Holmes is set to appear in court Monday for an initial hearing, but the press is already asking what his punishment should be.

Specifically, U.S. cable news has been posing the death penalty question.

But it’s not just TV. Hop online and you’ll see the death penalty possibility raised, if not even championed, by blog and online newspaper reporters.

There are currently three inmates on death row in Colorado. Holmes is in solitary confinement at Arapahoe Detention Center and faces at least 71 charges in the shooting rampage that killed 12 and injured some 58 others.

But the other part of the talking head discussion is whether Holmes is even competent to stand trial — in which case the death penalty question could be a moot point. On CNN, former prosecutor Paul Callan takes that route.

“He may not be even competent enough to enter a courtroom and understand the proceedings, in which case he'll simply be sent to a mental hospital.”

Click here to read the full transcript



Source: Newsy, July 23, 2012

Related article:
12 hours ago
Colorado shooting suspect James E. Holmes is expected to make his first appearance Monday morning in a court case that appears so clear-cut that at least one expert said the legal machinations could come down to one...

Monday, March 5, 2012

China: The Execution Factor

It was designed as propaganda to deter would-be criminals. Instead interviews on death row have become China's new TV hit

With her silk scarves and immaculate make-up, Ding Yu looks every inch the modern television presenter. Indeed, for the past 5 years she has hosted a hugely successful prime-time show in China which has a devoted following of 40million viewers every Saturday night.

But while in Britain the weekend evening entertainment will be The X Factor or Strictly Come Dancing, Ms Ding’s show features harrowing – some would say voyeuristic – footage of prisoners confessing their crimes and begging forgiveness before being led away to their executions.

The scenes are recorded sometimes minutes before the prisoners are put to death, or in other cases when only days of their life remain.

The glamorous Ms Ding conducts face-to-face interviews with the prisoners, who have often committed especially gruesome crimes. Her subjects sit in handcuffs and leg chains, guarded by warders. She warms up with anodyne questions about favourite films or music, but then hectors the prisoners about the violent details of their crimes and eventually wrings apologies out of them.

She promises to relay final messages to family members, who are usually not allowed to visit them on death row. The cameras keep rolling as the condemned say a farewell message and are led away to be killed by firing squad or lethal injection.

Having begun life five years ago on a TV channel in Henan province in central China, Interviews Before Execution quickly became a hit with viewers and was given a prime-time Saturday night slot.

Scenes from the series will be shown in Britain for the 1st time next week in a BBC2 documentary. The BBC describes the Chinese series as an ‘extraordinary chat show’ which has made Ms Ding a national celebrity.

Ms Ding has covered more than 250 cases in Interviews Before Execution. She told a child killer: ‘Everyone should hate you.’ Her interviewees also included a jealous divorcé who stabbed his ex-wife in front of her parents.

In one scene, a prisoner in his 20s falls to his knees before his parents, who have been allowed to see him. He pleads: ‘Father, I was wrong. I’m sorry.’

Moments later, his parents see him about to be led away to his death. His distraught mother apologises for beating him once as a child and implores her son: ‘Go peacefully. It’s following government’s orders.’

Prison officers then push her aside and drag him away.

In another scene, a firing squad of about 20 men is briefed by a senior officer before executing condemned prisoners. ‘Some criminals will be very tough and difficult. That means they’ll be dangerous,’ the officer tells them.

Officials in the ruling Communist Party regard the series as a propaganda tool to warn citizens of the consequences of crime.

Inmates are selected for Ms Ding by judiciary officials who pick out what they consider suitable cases to ‘educate the public’. So far, the show’s makers claim, only 5 condemned prisoners who were asked have refused to be interviewed.

Convicted criminals in China can be put to death for 55 capital crimes, ranging from theft to crimes against the state. However, the show focuses exclusively on murder cases, conspicuously avoiding any crimes that might have political elements.

The case that has drawn the largest number of viewers so far is that of Bao Rongting, an openly gay man who was condemned to death for murdering his mother and then violating her dead body.

3 extra episodes were devoted to his story as viewing figures soared. Homosexuality is still regarded as taboo in most of China, and the sensational trailers described his interviews as ‘shining a light on a mysterious group of people in our country’.

When Bao was executed, no family members turned up to say farewell. His final conversation before being led to his death was on camera with a decidedly wary Ms Ding, who admitted to being unsettled by his sexuality. In a remarkable scene, he asks if she will do him a last favour by shaking his hand before he dies. She hesitates, before lightly touching his hand with her finger and then pulling it away.

She later confessed to being unsure if she should have shaken his hand, saying with obvious distaste: ‘There was a lot of dirt under his nails. For a long time there was a feeling in this finger. I can’t describe that feeling.’

The series has made a household name of Ms Ding, who is married and has a young son. She is often recognised in the street while doing her shopping with her family.

Denying her show is exploitative, she said: ‘Some viewers might consider it cruel to ask a criminal to do an interview when they are about to be executed. On the contrary, they want to be heard.

‘When I am face-to-face with them I feel sorry and regretful for them. But I don’t sympathise with them, for they should pay a heavy price for their wrongdoing. They deserve it.’

However, she admits to being haunted by those she has interviewed. She once woke on a train in the middle of the night and, looking out of her window, saw a vision of the executed prisoners she had interviewed standing in a line beside her carriage.

‘Their faces were so real and all of them were standing there looking at me,’ she said. ‘I was horrified – I have heard so many cases. It is really not good for me at all. I have too much rubbish in my heart.’

Lu Peijin, the boss of TV Legal Channel in Henan province, said Ms Ding came up with the concept for the show and he agreed immediately, but that getting approval from officials was a long process.

‘I thought it was a great idea right away,’ said Mr Lu, who said that the stated aim of the show was not to entertain but to ‘inform and educate according to government policy’.

‘We want the audience to be warned,’ he said. ‘If they are warned, tragedies might be averted. That is good for society.’

Mr Lu said Ms Ding’s feminine image endears her to both audiences and the prisoners she interviews. ‘We say she is the beauty with the beasts,’ he said.

China is believed to kill more prisoners every year than the rest of the world combined, and the communist state has been widely criticised over its use of the death penalty.

There is no presumption of innocence under Chinese law. The condemned are often put to death as little as 7 days after their convictions are confirmed by the Supreme Court.

The exact number of executions is a state secret, but it has been estimated that about 2,000 prisoners a year are executed in China, although rates are believed to have fallen in recent years.

China is concerned that the BBC documentary will damage the country’s image overseas and lead to fresh accusations of human rights abuses. Ms Ding and her colleagues have been banned from giving any further interviews.

Officials are particularly upset because next week’s BBC broadcast comes at a politically sensitive time – only days after China’s pseudo-parliament, the National People’s Congress, begins its annual session in the capital Beijing.

A Chinese TV executive who works on Interviews Before Execution said: ‘When the party officials realised the extent of the footage the BBC would use, they were very concerned about it.

‘Although the documentary was approved, Ms Ding and her colleagues have been told off for giving the BBC team too much access. They have now been instructed not to give any further interviews to foreign media.

‘It’s fair to say the BBC programme has created a problem for us. Officials here do not want the foreign media saying there are no human rights in China, particularly at this sensitive time politically.’

Reached by phone at her TV station in Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, Ms Ding told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I’m afraid I can’t speak to you about this. Our show involves a very sensitive subject involving human rights.

‘We have been instructed not to accept any further interviews about the programme, particularly with foreign media.’

A BBC spokeswoman said the programme was made by a Chinese production company and then acquired and revised in accordance with BBC guidelines.

The spokeswoman said: ‘The programme provides a revealing insight into Chinese attitudes to the death penalty. By showing rare footage of China’s death row alongside interviews with convicts, judges and journalists, it opens up an aspect of China that is normally hidden from the world.’

Source: Daily Mail, March 4, 2012

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

The CSI Effect: Big Surprise, TV is Dramatized

Have you ever watched the popular television shows “Bones” or “Dexter”? Or how about one of the many “CSI” spinoffs? If your answer is yes, then you've been exposed to one of the newest trends to impact the forensic science field: the CSI Effect.

The CSI Effect refers to the influence popular crime and forensic TV shows have on the public—especially jurors involved in criminal trials. On shows like “CSI” and “Law & Order”, the science looks very cut and dry: either the DNA matches or it doesn't, and the fingerprint always belongs to a possible suspect. In reality, science is not always so conclusive.

Unreasonable Jurors

In the United States, criminal defendants are tried by a jury of their peers—people who supposedly hold no grudges against the defendant or biases about the case. But modern juries, influenced by the unrealistic forensic science techniques shown on popular TV shows, are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the work performed by police officers, forensic science professionals, and even lawyers.

A 2008 study conducted by Monica Robbers, an American criminologist, found that 62 percent of defense lawyers and 69 percent of judges believe jurors have unrealistic expectations about the reliability of forensic evidence. The problem is that many jurors are programmed by their favorite television shows to expect copious amounts of conclusive DNA or fingerprint evidence. They feel (unreasonably) that this scientific evidence is the only way to determine whether the defendant is 100 percent innocent or guilty.

DNA evidence is rarely as easy to come by in real life as it is on TV, where eagle-eyed investigators can spy a drop of blood from across the room. In reality, DNA degrades so quickly that the amount you can obtain from a single blood drop (or strand of hair) might not be enough to identify the person it belonged to. And you can forget about trying to get DNA from extremely old human tissue samples—there won't be anything left. Read more.

Source: Forensic Science.net, July 26, 2010